Why Tommy Lascelles Hated Wallis Simpson – And Tried To Destroy Her

Why Tommy Lascelles Hated Wallis Simpson - And Tried To Destroy Her

LONDON — For nearly half a century, the most consequential royal servant in Britain waged a quiet, relentless campaign against the American divorcée who brought down a king, and newly examined accounts of his life reveal that Tommy Lascelles reached his damning verdict on Edward VIII years before Wallis Simpson ever entered the picture.

Alan Frederick Lascelles, known throughout palace corridors as Tommy, did not begin by hating Wallis Simpson. He began by losing faith in the man who would eventually choose her over the crown.

Long before Simpson became the most controversial woman in royal Britain, Lascelles had already concluded that Edward, Prince of Wales, was charming, selfish, impulsive, emotionally unstable and dangerously unsuited to become king.

Born in 1887 into a family woven through the upper reaches of British life, Lascelles was aristocratic without being grand enough to spend his life doing nothing. His cousin Henry Lascelles would marry Princess Mary, the only daughter of King George V and Queen Mary.

He belonged to the generation shaped by the First World War. He served as an officer, fought in France, was wounded and received the Military Cross. Men of his background had grown up expecting privilege; the war taught them that privilege came with an invoice.

Lascelles emerged with a hard idea of duty. One did what was required. One did not complain excessively.

One certainly did not abandon an obligation because the evening entertainment looked more appealing.

In 1920, he joined the staff of Edward, eldest son of George V and heir to the throne. Edward was everything a modern prince was supposed to look like: young, slim, fashionable, energetic, famous and almost impossibly popular.

At first, Lascelles liked him. Edward could be enormously charming. He had an informal manner that made people feel relaxed.

For a monarchy trying to remain connected to a society transformed by war, this talent was valuable.

The difficulty was what happened when the crowds disappeared. Edward disliked paperwork, became bored by routine, resented ceremonial obligations and disliked being corrected. He enjoyed golf, dancing, parties, cocktails and the freedom to arrange his day according to his mood.

Every private pleasure came attached to the British throne. Lascelles discovered that serving the Prince of Wales meant constantly negotiating between what Edward wanted and what his position required.

Edward had a particular weakness for married women. For years, one of the central figures in his emotional life was Freda Dudley Ward, married, sophisticated and deeply involved with the prince. Edward telephoned her constantly and wrote with extraordinary emotional intensity.

The relationship gave Lascelles an early education in something that would become crucial later. Edward did not merely fall in love. He attached himself.

When he needed somebody, he could need that person with a force that overwhelmed almost everything else.

King George V had almost the opposite personality: formal, conventional, punctual, disciplined and devoted to routine. Edward considered this suffocating. Lascelles considered it constitutional oxygen.

By the middle of the 1920s, Lascelles was increasingly disturbed by what he saw. During a Canadian tour in 1927, he reached something close to despair. The magnificent public reception given to Edward only sharpened the contrast with what his private secretary was witnessing behind the scenes.

Lascelles spoke privately to Stanley Baldwin, one of the most experienced political figures in Britain. The subject was extraordinary. Lascelles questioned whether Edward was fit to become king.

He had reached the point where loyalty to the monarchy required disloyalty to the heir.

By 1929, their relationship had deteriorated beyond repair. Lascelles resigned from Edward’s household. This was not a casual career decision.

Edward was expected to become king, probably for decades. Remaining close to him could have brought enormous influence and prestige. Instead, he walked away.

Wallis Simpson had not yet become important to Edward. Lascelles did not dislike Edward because of Wallis. He disliked what Edward became before Wallis ever occupied the central place in his life.

She would later become the symbol of everything he feared, but she was not the beginning.

Edward’s favorite refuge became Fort Belvedere in Windsor Great Park. The house offered him something Buckingham Palace never could: control. He could entertain whom he pleased, garden, remodel rooms and host weekends more relaxed than the rigid world surrounding his parents.

Among the Americans in his circle was Thelma, Lady Furness. Through her, Edward encountered another American woman in January 1931: Wallis Simpson. She was 34 years old and had already been married twice.

Wallis was not generally described as a great conventional beauty. She compensated with style, discipline, conversation and presence. She had another advantage with Edward.

She was not overwhelmed by him. She could tease him. She could disagree.

Edward found this intoxicating. He was surrounded by people who obeyed him. Wallis could make him work for her approval.

By 1934, the balance had changed. Lady Furness traveled to America. During her absence, Edward and Wallis grew much closer.

Soon the prince’s attachment became obvious. His long emotional relationship with Freda Dudley Ward faded with startling speed.

Power entered quietly, wearing an excellent dress and deciding who would be invited for dinner. This was exactly the kind of influence that made professional courtiers uneasy. The monarchy had procedures for ministers, for officials, for private secretaries.

It had no procedure for a woman whom the future king simply refused to be without.

King George V became increasingly concerned. So did Queen Mary. Their objection was not simply that Wallis was American.

British aristocratic families had been marrying wealthy Americans for decades. The real danger was Edward himself.

By 1935, Lascelles was serving King George V. He had escaped Edward’s household only to find himself watching Edward’s private life become a problem for the entire royal family.

Wallis did not need to insult Lascelles personally. She did not need to plot against him. The simple fact of her influence was enough.

Everything Lascelles had tried unsuccessfully to impose through discipline, Wallis seemed able to accomplish through affection.

Edward had ignored secretaries. He listened to Wallis. Edward resented lectures.

He accepted criticism from Wallis. Edward resisted royal schedules. He rearranged his life for Wallis.

At Sandringham in January 1936, the old king’s health collapsed. On January 20, 1936, King George V died. Edward became King Edward VIII.

He was 41 years old.

The trouble began almost immediately. On January 21, 1936, barely a day after the death of George V, Edward’s accession was formally proclaimed at St. James’s Palace.

Edward watched part of the proclamation from a window. Wallis Simpson watched with him.

She was still Ernest Simpson’s wife. To Edward, the gesture probably seemed harmless. To men such as Tommy Lascelles, the symbolism was appalling.

George V had been dead for hours. The new reign was only beginning.

Lascelles had returned to royal service, intending to work for George V. Instead, within weeks, he found himself serving Edward again as an assistant private secretary. It must have felt like discovering that a train one had carefully left several stations earlier had somehow arrived at the new destination first.

By the summer of 1936, Edward made a decision that brought the private problem into international view. Instead of following the expected royal routine, he chose a Mediterranean holiday with Wallis. The king chartered the yacht Nahlin.

Outside Britain, newspapers published images and reports of the king traveling with Mrs. Simpson. The story was no longer a piece of elite London gossip.

A British king was being protected from British readers by British editors while foreigners discussed his romantic life over breakfast.

On October 27, 1936, Wallis’s divorce case came before the court. The decree was granted, though it would not become final immediately. Until that day, Ernest Simpson had stood between Edward and marriage.

Now the British government did.

On November 13, Alec Harding, the king’s private secretary, wrote directly to Edward. The message was unmistakable. The British newspapers would not remain silent forever.

Once they began reporting the relationship, Harding believed the consequences could be disastrous.

Three days later, on November 16, Edward met Stanley Baldwin at Buckingham Palace. The king told him that he intended to marry Wallis once she was legally free. Edward responded with the determination that had been building for months.

He intended to marry her. If necessary, he was prepared to give up the throne.

On November 25, Baldwin met Edward again. The king formally raised the alternative marriage plan. Wallis would not be queen.

Any future children would not inherit. Edward would remain on the throne. Baldwin told him that he did not believe Parliament would accept it.

On December 2, 1936, the Bishop of Bradford delivered a speech that would have been unremarkable under almost any other king. He suggested that the king needed greater awareness of the grace of God. The words were carefully phrased.

The implication was not.

On December 3, the story exploded into public view. For months, Americans had been reading about the king and Mrs. Simpson while British newspapers maintained an extraordinary silence.

Suddenly the protective curtain disappeared. Wallis Simpson was everywhere.

Within hours, millions of people who had assumed Edward was preparing calmly for his coronation discovered that he might instead be preparing to leave the throne.

Wallis panicked. On December 3, she left Fort Belvedere. She traveled south.

With friends assisting her, Wallis left Britain for France. She was no longer merely traveling. She was fleeing the most famous romance in the world.

She began urging Edward not to abdicate. She told Edward that she was willing to give him up. She wanted the crisis stopped.

Edward refused. His dependence had become too complete.

By December 10, the decision had reached paper. At Fort Belvedere, Edward signed the instrument of abdication. His three younger brothers witnessed it.

The document was astonishingly short compared with the enormous human consequences attached to it.

On December 11, the abdication became effective. Edward was no longer king. His younger brother Albert became King George VI.

The choice of name was deliberate. The message was almost painfully clear. The experiment was over.

The old line continued.

That evening Edward addressed the nation by radio. He explained that he had found it impossible to carry the responsibilities of kingship without the help and support of the woman he loved. The sentence transformed the entire crisis.

Months of constitutional argument became one emotional image. A man had chosen love over a throne. It was magnificent storytelling.

It was also incomplete.

Edward left Britain almost immediately. He traveled to Austria. Wallis remained in France.

They could not immediately marry because her divorce from Ernest Simpson was not yet final. Edward had abandoned the throne for a woman he was not yet legally free to marry.

Back in Britain, George VI struggled with his new position. Tommy Lascelles became increasingly valuable. Lascelles transferred his loyalty without hesitation.

He had never believed his highest loyalty belonged to Edward personally. It belonged to the sovereign. Edward was no longer sovereign.

George was.

The first major battle concerned Edward’s title. George VI created his brother Duke of Windsor. The dangerous question was Wallis.

Edward expected his wife to share his royal rank. The royal family thought otherwise.

Wallis would become Duchess of Windsor, but she would not become Her Royal Highness. To Edward, it was devastating. The decision meant that his wife would be publicly marked as inferior to him.

On June 3, 1937, Edward and Wallis married at the Château de Candé in France. The setting was elegant. The guest list was not royal.

No member of Edward’s immediate family attended.

In October 1937, the Duke and Duchess of Windsor visited Germany. Adolf Hitler had been chancellor since 1933. The German authorities received Edward with enthusiasm.

Then they met Hitler. Photographs of the former British king with the German dictator created exactly the sort of political difficulty Lascelles feared.

After France fell in 1940, Edward and Wallis traveled through Spain and then Portugal. Their position alarmed London. The solution was the Bahamas.

Edward was appointed governor. The appointment placed him far from Europe. It also removed him from places where Axis governments might try to exploit his status.

In 1943, Lascelles became George VI’s private secretary. Later, he would also serve Queen Elizabeth II. His influence placed him at the heart of decisions about access, invitations, royal precedent, family complications and the proper treatment of the Duke of Windsor.

He knew Edward’s tactics. He knew his moods. And unlike newer officials, Lascelles possessed one enormous advantage.

Edward could not charm him. That weapon had expired years earlier.

On February 6, 1952, George VI died at Sandringham. He was only 56. Princess Elizabeth was in Kenya when the news reached her.

At 25, she became Queen Elizabeth II.

Once again, Tommy Lascelles experienced the death of one sovereign and the accession of another. But this transition was completely different from 1936. There was no fear that Elizabeth might reject the fundamental demands of monarchy.

She had grown up watching what the crown had done to her father. She knew the price. She accepted it.

The same man who had once concluded that Edward was unfit to be king was now helping guide the young niece whose destiny had been transformed by Edward’s abdication. Lascelles had served the uncle. He had served the father.

Now he served the daughter.

Edward died in Paris in 1972. He was 77. His body was returned to Britain.

The man who had spent most of his adult life outside the country after surrendering its crown was buried at Frogmore near Windsor.

Wallis came to Britain as his widow. For the first time in decades, the woman who had once seemed capable of becoming queen stood unmistakably inside a royal family occasion. But she came because Edward was dead.

Wallis lived another 14 years. Her final period was increasingly lonely. Her health declined.

The woman who had once dominated dinner tables and frightened governments became frail and secluded in Paris. She died in 1986. She too was buried at Frogmore beside Edward.

In death at last, husband and wife occupied royal ground together. No prime minister could object. No private secretary could rearrange the seating.

No courtier could deny the grave.

Lascelles never truly destroyed Wallis Simpson. She obtained the one thing Edward had promised her: him. She kept him for the rest of his life.

But Lascelles helped make certain that she did not obtain the second thing Edward believed should follow naturally: acceptance by the crown.

Wallis won the man. Lascelles protected the monarchy. Edward paid for both victories.

The tragedy was that Lascelles had understood the central problem before Wallis Simpson ever became important. Edward wanted to be loved without being controlled. He wanted privilege without confinement.

He wanted the crown without surrendering himself to it.

Wallis did not put those desires into him. She simply became the person for whom he was finally willing to act upon them.

That was why Tommy Lascelles could never regard her as an ordinary woman who had fallen in love with the wrong man. When he looked at Wallis, he saw the moment Edward’s private weakness acquired enough power to challenge the throne.

And when Wallis looked back at men like Lascelles, she saw the people who had taken a love 𝒶𝒻𝒻𝒶𝒾𝓇 and turned it into a sentence that lasted the rest of her life.

Neither side forgave the other. The monarchy survived. The Windsors remained together.

And the king, who once seemed to possess everything, discovered that after giving up a throne, even love could not give him back the one thing he had assumed would always be his: a place at the center.