He Insulted Scarfo Over Cement — Then the Mob Took His Life

He Insulted Scarfo Over Cement — Then the Mob Took His Life

On December 16, 1979, Vincent Falcone walked into a beachfront apartment in Margate, New Jersey, expecting to share Christmas drinks with men he had known for years. Nicodemo Scarfo was sitting in front of the television, appearing relaxed. His nephew Philip Leonetti was inside the room, along with Lawrence Merlino and plumber Joseph Salerno Jr. Falcone had no reason to believe he had walked into an execution chamber.

Thumbnail

He socialized with these men. He worked in the same construction field. He drank with them. He had spent enough time around Scarfo to believe that any tension between them had faded.

Scarfo looked toward Falcone and asked him to prepare the drinks. Falcone turned his back. He walked away, filled the glasses, and returned to the room. Behind him, Philip Leonetti raised a .

32 caliber pistol. The weapon did not belong to Leonetti. It belonged to Joseph Salerno, the terrified plumber, who stood only a few feet away. Leonetti fired into the back of Falcone’s head.

Falcone spun as his body began to collapse, trying to see who had attacked him. Scarfo watched his nephew stand over the wounded man. Then little Nicky said he might put another bullet into Falcone himself. Leonetti refused to give up the moment.

He fired again into Falcone’s chest. And he was shot again in the heart. Don’t you feel any kind of… what do you feel?

I feel nothing. I feel nothing. I feel cold. The concrete contractor who had entered expecting drinks fell dead inside the apartment.

Scarfo did not appear shocked. He did not rush toward the door. He began giving instructions. The gun had to disappear.

Falcone’s car had to be collected. The apartment had to be cleaned. The body had to be wrapped and moved away. As Joseph Salerno tied up the dead man and covered him with a blanket, Scarfo watched the work and said three words that Salerno would remember for the rest of his life: I love this.

Vincent Falcone was not killed because he was an informant. He did not steal mob money. He did not attack the Scarfo family. According to testimony later presented in federal court, Falcone’s fatal mistake was expressing an opinion.

During a conversation weeks earlier, he was said to have called Nicky Scarfo crazy and said Scarfo should be kept out of the concrete business. The words reached Scarfo. Now, the man Falcone had criticized watched his nephew place Falcone’s body inside the trunk of a car. But the murder would not produce the result Scarfo expected.

One witness inside the apartment would become so frightened that he would go to the police. Scarfo would try to destroy that witness and even target the witness’s father. The first jury would acquit Scarfo, making him believe that fear and loyalty had protected him. Then, years later, the same murder case would resurface within a federal racketeering indictment that helped send little Nicky and most of his organization to prison.

Vincent Falcone was a concrete contractor who worked and socialized with men connected to the underworld in Philadelphia and South Jersey. Construction was transforming the face of Atlantic City. Casino gambling brought massive investment to a city filled with old hotels, dilapidated neighborhoods, and vacant properties. The new casinos required concrete.

Hotels needed foundations, parking structures, road improvements, and utility work. Residential buildings and commercial projects required contractors, workers, trucks, and materials. Every construction project generated legitimate money. It also created opportunities for organized crime.

A mob figure did not need to own an entire casino. Control over a single supplier, a union official, a trucking company, or a contractor could generate money from every floor that was built. Concrete was particularly valuable because construction could not continue without it. Materials had to arrive on schedule.

Drivers had to deliver before it hardened. Workers had to pour it correctly. Any delay could stop an entire worksite. The man who controlled those supplies held influence over developers spending millions of dollars every week.

Nicky Scarfo understood that influence well. He had spent years working from Atlantic City while the Philadelphia crime family was under the control of Angelo Bruno. Bruno preferred quiet arrangements, political relationships, and profitable practices that avoided unnecessary public violence. Scarfo was different.

He had already served time in prison for killing a sailor during a confrontation at an Atlantic City restaurant. He viewed violence not just as a last resort but as a language. A beating could answer disrespect. A disappearance could end a business dispute.

A murder could teach others how they were expected to behave. Scarfo was not yet the official boss when Falcone was killed. But he already expected the men of Atlantic City to recognize his authority. He operated from offices on Georgia Avenue and maintained relationships with contractors, bartenders, union figures, and local criminals.

He was short in stature and extremely sensitive to any hint that others considered him weak. The men around him learned that an insult did not end when the conversation ended. Scarfo carried it with him. He repeated it.

He waited for the right opportunity. Then he responded in a way designed to be remembered by the entire neighborhood. Falcone understood that Scarfo was dangerous. Yet he made the mistake of believing that some conversations remained private.

The discussion was not precisely recorded. According to Joseph Salerno’s later account, Falcone was intoxicated when he expressed his opinion of Scarfo. Reports indicate he called little Nicky crazy. Then he went further.

Falcone said Scarfo should not be allowed into the concrete contracting business. That second part turned a personal insult into a financial threat. Calling Scarfo crazy questioned his judgment. Saying he should be kept out of concrete challenged his right to participate in the construction boom that was changing Atlantic City.

Falcone was not merely criticizing a personality. He was suggesting that people in the field should keep Scarfo away from one of the region’s most valuable businesses. In ordinary life, a contractor could disagree with another contractor. He could warn business partners that someone was untrustworthy.

He could refuse to enter a partnership. Inside Scarfo’s world, the words attacked reputation itself. If one contractor could openly say that little Nicky should be kept out, another might refuse to give him work. A union official might ignore Scarfo’s recommendation.

A developer might choose another company. An associate might begin to wonder whether Scarfo was really as powerful as he claimed. Mob authority depends on impressions. Scarfo did not need everyone to like him.

He needed them to believe that criticizing him had consequences. The words came back through the social circle. Reports also indicated that Falcone made insulting comments about Philip Leonetti. That made the insult useful to Scarfo in another way.

Philip was not just one of his young associates. He was his nephew, the son of Scarfo’s sister. Leonetti grew up under his uncle’s influence in Atlantic City. Scarfo presented himself as the controlling man of the family and gradually drew Philip toward organized crime.

The relationship was a mixture of family loyalty and criminal training. Scarfo taught him who deserved respect. He taught him that fear was more reliable than affection. He taught him that a man proves himself by carrying out difficult orders without hesitation.

Leonetti wanted his uncle’s approval. That gave Scarfo power no ordinary boss possessed. He could portray the murder as a family duty. Falcone had insulted them both.

Scarfo could now make Philip answer the insult and prove that his loyalty to his uncle outweighed any friendship with the victim. The murder required planning. Scarfo first needed a weapon that would not lead investigators directly to him. In late 1979, he approached Joseph Salerno Jr.

inside a Philadelphia restaurant. Salerno was not a professional killer. He was a plumber who worked near Falcone, Leonetti, and other men involved in Atlantic City construction. His financial problems pushed him closer to this group.

He borrowed money and entered relationships he did not fully understand until withdrawal became dangerous. Scarfo asked whether Salerno owned any firearms. Salerno said he had a rifle and an old . 32 caliber pistol.

A few weeks later, Scarfo ordered him to bring the weapons to the Scarfo company office on Georgia Avenue in Atlantic City. Scarfo, Leonetti, and Lawrence Merlino took possession of them. Salerno understood enough to feel afraid. He did not know what Scarfo intended to do.

That ignorance protected the plan. If Salerno had known a murder was coming, he might have refused to attend. He might have called the police before the shooting. He might have warned Falcone.

Scarfo needed him afraid but uninformed. The borrowed pistol did more than provide a weapon that could not be traced. It implicated Salerno. If police found the gun or identified it through forensic evidence, the investigation could lead to him.

Scarfo could tell Salerno that silence was now the only way to protect himself. The gun turned a potential witness into someone who might appear involved. On Sunday, December 16, Salerno was at his home in Brigantine. Christmas was approaching.

He wanted to spend the evening with his children and decorate the family tree. Then the phone rang. Salerno was ordered to go to the office on Georgia Avenue. When he arrived, he said he wanted to go home.

The men did not let the evening end that easily. He got into a car with Falcone, Leonetti, and Lawrence Merlino. They drove to an apartment in Margate where Scarfo was waiting. The atmosphere was designed to feel friendly.

Christmas drinks. Men who knew each other. An apartment on the beach instead of a dark alley. Scarfo watching television instead of pacing with a weapon.

The most effective traps are the ones that allow the victim to justify every warning. Falcone may have known his comment had reached Scarfo, but Scarfo continued to allow him around the group. The invitation suggested forgiveness. If little Nicky really intended to kill him, Falcone could tell himself, why would everyone gather openly for drinks?

That was exactly why the meeting worked. Scarfo had not forgotten. He waited until Falcone stopped expecting any reaction. Inside the apartment, Scarfo asked the condemned man to prepare drinks for the people about to kill him.

The request served several purposes. It made the meeting look natural. It placed Falcone in a subservient role, serving the men in the room. Most importantly, it forced him to move away from Leonetti.

Philip used Salerno’s pistol. The first shot struck Falcone from behind. After the second shot, there was no more discussion about concrete, respect, or apologies. Scarfo’s opinion was the only one allowed inside the apartment.

The men divided the cleanup tasks immediately. Leonetti and Merlino left to dispose of the weapon and retrieve Falcone’s car. Salerno stayed behind with Scarfo. He was asked to tie up the body and wrap it inside a cover.

Salerno later described performing this task while still absorbing what he had witnessed. He had entered the apartment as a frightened acquaintance. Now he was handling the body of a man he knew while the killer kept his gun. Scarfo’s comment that he loved what was happening destroyed any possibility that the murder had been an impulsive reaction.

Little Nicky was enjoying the control. Falcone had criticized him. Now Scarfo could watch other men erase Falcone while no one in the room dared object. When Merlino returned with the car, Salerno helped place the body in the trunk.

The conspirators moved the car and abandoned it elsewhere in Margate. They returned to clean the apartment. Clothing and other evidence were disposed of through the sewer system. Then the men ate dinner.

That meal showed the emotional order Scarfo wanted his followers to adopt. A man could drink beside them one moment. Minutes later they could wrap his corpse. Afterward, they were expected to eat as if the evening had been ordinary work.

Violence is followed by routine, because routine makes killers feel protected. The men convinced themselves that Falcone had caused his own death with reckless talk. They were only enforcing the rules. Joseph Salerno could not accept this explanation.

The murder showed him the real meaning of Scarfo’s friendship. Salerno had worked alongside these men. They bought him meals. They talked about families, construction jobs, and ordinary neighborhood problems.

On the surface, they seemed generous and familiar. Underneath, Scarfo could decide that one of them deserved to die and expect everyone to participate. Salerno realized he was now trapped. Scarfo could use the pistol to tie him to the murder.

The men could claim he had been willingly involved. If he tried to leave quietly, Scarfo might decide he knew too much. If he stayed, another invitation could place him where Falcone had stood. Sitting behind a bulletproof barrier, surrounded by at least a dozen federal and state police officers, Joseph Salerno told his story that during his former association with Nicky Scarfo, he heard the alleged mob boss boast about controlling Atlantic City unions.

Authorities placed him and his family under protection because his testimony was directed squarely at Scarfo, Leonetti, and Merlino. Investigators now had something rare in mob cases: an eyewitness who had been inside the room. Salerno could identify the gun. He could explain the details of the car ride.

He could describe Scarfo watching television. He could describe the first shot, the second shot, and the orders that followed. He could explain how the body was placed into Falcone’s car. But witnesses connected to organized crime enter court with weaknesses.

Salerno had borrowed money. He had associated with gangsters. His personal gun had been used. He helped wrap and move the victim instead of calling the police immediately.

Defense attorneys could describe him as a participant protecting himself rather than an innocent observer telling the truth. The state murder trial began in 1980. Scarfo, Philip Leonetti, and Lawrence Merlino sat at the defense table. Salerno testified against men he had once considered friends.

The defense presented alibi witnesses and attacked inconsistencies in the prosecution’s reconstruction of the crime. After deliberations lasting only a few hours, the jury acquitted all three defendants. Scarfo left the courthouse believing his system had worked. The body had been moved.

The apartment had been cleaned. The gun had disappeared. The key witness had been damaged by his own proximity to the crime. An acquittal does not prove the murder never happened.

It means the state failed to convince the jury beyond a reasonable doubt. For Scarfo, that distinction did not matter. He was free. Salerno went into hiding.

He and his family moved frequently. Names changed. Relationships collapsed. Ordinary contact with relatives became dangerous.

Scarfo was said to have placed a large bounty on his head. When Salerno remained out of reach under protection, the organization tried to reach his father. In 1982, a gunman appeared at the office of Joseph Salerno Sr. in Wildwood Crest and shot him when he opened the door.

The father survived. The message was still perfectly clear. Scarfo could not reach the witness, so he attacked the witness’s blood. The organization claimed Salerno had betrayed his friends.

Scarfo had already demonstrated the meaning of friendship by ordering Falcone’s murder and forcing Salerno to participate in the cleanup. While Salerno lived in exile, Scarfo’s power continued to grow. Angelo Bruno was assassinated in 1980. Philip Testa succeeded him briefly before being killed by a bomb in 1981.

Scarfo emerged as the boss of the Philadelphia and South Jersey crime family. The qualities Falcone had criticized now defined the organization. Scarfo demanded personal loyalty. Murders required his approval.

Associates hoping to be formally inducted were expected to prove themselves through violence on the family’s behalf. Insults, business disputes, and doubts about loyalty frequently became death sentences. Philip Leonetti rose beside him. The nephew who fired the first shot at Falcone became a captain and eventually underboss.

From Scarfo’s perspective, the system had worked. He had used the murder to strengthen the bond between uncle and nephew. Leonetti could not easily leave because he had committed his crimes under Scarfo’s direct observation. Every promotion tied him more closely to the man who knew everything he had done.

But fear creates cooperation as easily as it creates obedience. By the mid-1980s, many important Philadelphia gangsters had begun talking to authorities. Investigators gathered murders, attempted murders, gambling, drug trafficking, loan sharking, and extortion money into a federal racketeering case. The murder of Vincent Falcone returned as one of the criminal acts illustrating how Scarfo’s enterprise operated.

The state jury had originally acquitted the defendants. Federal prosecutors represented an independent authority and charged the murder as part of a broader violation of federal racketeering law. Joseph Salerno testified again. This time, Falcone’s death was not a single isolated incident.

Jurors heard it alongside a pattern of carefully authorized violence. They learned that the boss held sole authority to order murders. They heard how the Scarfo organization collected money and punished those who threatened its reputation. Falcone’s murder became an early example of the culture Scarfo later imposed on the entire family.

In November 1988, a federal jury convicted Scarfo, Leonetti, and several other defendants in the wide-ranging racketeering case. The jury specifically found that Scarfo and Leonetti had participated in the murder of Falcone as an act of racketeering. About nine years after the apartment meeting, the killing finally helped produce federal convictions. An appeals court later upheld the result.

The Scarfo organization was dismantled. Leaders and soldiers received extremely long prison sentences. The boss who believed his acquittal had buried the Falcone case permanently learned that a murder could remain alive in the evidence even after the first prosecution failed. Philip Leonetti eventually became a government witness himself.

The nephew Scarfo had trained to kill, promoted to captain and then underboss, broke with his uncle after their convictions. Scarfo had believed that shared blood and shared murder would guarantee loyalty. Instead, the nephew knew more about the family’s crimes than any other surviving member. Leonetti could explain the hierarchy, the orders, the meetings, the bodies, and the private side of Nicky Scarfo that ordinary soldiers never saw.

The same relationship Scarfo used to create a reliable killer eventually created an extremely dangerous witness. That is the ultimate result of Vincent Falcone’s murder. The killing was intended to prove that no one could speak against Nicky Scarfo. It produced Joseph Salerno, one of the first witnesses willing to describe Scarfo’s violence from inside the room.

The system was designed to turn Philip Leonetti into a permanent family asset. Leonetti eventually cooperated as well. Scarfo wanted Falcone dead to protect his entry into the construction industry.

Instead, the crime became one of the pieces of evidence used to prove that his organization operated through racketeering and violence.