The Secret Andrew Parker Bowles Kept for Thirty Years: Why He Divorced Queen Camilla

The Secret Andrew Parker Bowles Kept for Thirty Years: Why He Divorced Queen Camilla

On May 6, 2023, an 83-year-old man in morning dress took his seat inside Westminster Abbey and watched a woman he had once called his wife be crowned queen.

He had married her half a century earlier, on a summer morning with the household cavalry lining the aisle. He had lost her slowly to the man now lowering the crown onto her head.

He did not look away. He did not speak.

For 30 years, the world had waited for Andrew Parker Bowles to tell his side, to sell the secret, to name the wound. He never did.

The most famous wronged husband in Britain sat in silence and smiled. The question was why.

Long before he was the most famous cuckold in Britain, Andrew Parker Bowles was the man every mother in the county wanted for her daughter.

He was born on December 27, 1939, into a family that had ridden and hunted and worshipped the same way for centuries. His father was Derek Parker Bowles of Donnington Castle House in Berkshire. His mother was Ann de Trafford, a daughter of one of the old Catholic baronetcies.

Through his father, the blood ran back to an earl. Through his mother, it ran back to money and land and the quiet confidence of people who had never once had to ask whether they belonged.

He was the eldest of four children. Among those said to have stood as his godparents was Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother herself. The claim is repeated often and documented loosely, but what matters is that it was believable.

The family was Roman Catholic. In a country whose throne had been closed to Catholics since the settlement of 1701, a Catholic boy of good family could ride beside royalty, could serve them, could love them, but there were doors that would never open to him.

He was sent to Ampleforth, the great Benedictine school in Yorkshire. From there he went to the Royal Military Academy at Sandhurst, and in 1960 he was commissioned into the Royal Horse Guards, the regiment known simply as the Blues.

It was the most glamorous soldiering in Britain. It put a young man on a black horse in a shining breastplate at the shoulder of the monarch.

He was tall and easy and handsome in the way that made rooms turn. In the spring of 1969, he rode in the Grand National, the cruelest steeplechase in the world, on a horse called The Fossa. He came home.

By the turn of the 1970s, he was a serving officer in the most senior regiment of the British Army, heir to a comfortable estate and an old Catholic name, and by the reckoning of every hostess in London, among the two or three most eligible bachelors in the country.

Before she was a queen, before she was a duchess, Camilla Shand was a young woman in love with a soldier who would not settle down. That soldier was Andrew Parker Bowles.

She was born on July 17, 1947, at King's College Hospital in London. Her father was Major Bruce Shand, a cavalry officer of the 12th Royal Lancers who had been awarded the Military Cross for the retreat to Dunkirk in 1940 and a bar to it for the desert fighting of 1942.

Near Mersa Matruh in 1942, his vehicle was destroyed. Two of his men were killed, he was wounded, and he was taken prisoner. He spent the rest of the war behind wire in Germany.

He came home, became a wine merchant in Mayfair and a master of foxhounds in Sussex, and raised his daughter to understand what honor was and exactly what it cost.

Camilla grew up between a Georgian place called The Laines at Plumpton in the Sussex Downs and a home in South Kensington. She was not a conventional beauty in the manner the magazines demanded. What she had was better and rarer: she was funny, warm, earthy, and entirely without side.

She met Andrew Parker Bowles in the late 1960s. By one good account, the introduction came through his younger brother Simon, who worked at her father's wine firm.

She fell for him with her whole heart. What followed was not a courtship so much as a long and painful education.

Their relationship ran on and off for years, and the reason it kept breaking was always the same. Andrew Parker Bowles could not be faithful to her.

She waited. For years, Camilla Shand waited for a man who would not commit, who drifted away and drifted back, who let her hope and then let her down.

There was another inheritance in the family, quieter and stranger, that reached all the way back to a king. Camilla's great-grandmother was Alice Keppel, the celebrated mistress of King Edward VII.

The blood of the most successful royal mistress in modern English history ran in the young woman who loved Andrew Parker Bowles. The pattern of that Edwardian arrangement, the married woman beloved of a prince, was written into her family before she was ever born.

In the space of a single strange year at the very start of the 1970s, both Andrew Parker Bowles and Camilla Shand found themselves entangled with the children of the Queen.

Andrew's connection was with Princess Anne, the Queen's only daughter. From around 1970, the two were linked, seen together at the racing and the hunting and the country weekends.

But there was a wall in the middle of it. He was Roman Catholic. Under the Act of Settlement, anyone in the line of succession who married a Catholic was struck out of that line.

For Princess Anne to marry a Catholic would have meant renouncing her place in the succession. The biographer Sally Bedell Smith put it plainly that the romance could not have been very serious precisely because Andrew was Catholic and marriage was therefore all but impossible.

While Andrew looked toward the palace, Camilla was meeting the heir. She encountered Charles, Prince of Wales, at the start of the 1970s at the polo, introduced by a mutual friend named Lucia Santa Cruz.

The attraction was immediate and it was real. He was shy, earnest, uncertain. She was warm and funny and unimpressed by any of it, and she made him feel, perhaps for the first time, entirely at ease.

There is a story told so often it has hardened into legend that at their first meeting she mentioned her great-grandmother, Alice Keppel, and said something to the effect that her family had a history with his.

But it was 1971, and the world was arranged against it. Charles was a serving officer of the Royal Navy, and duty called him away to sea. He did not fight for her, not then.

And into that unresolved space stepped Andrew Parker Bowles, back again, the way he always came back. His romance with the princess had gone as far as it could go and stopped at the wall.

The prince was at sea and had not spoken. The princess was beyond reach behind a constitutional wall. And the soldier and the girl who had loved him for years were both, at last, free at the same moment.

On July 4, 1973, the Guards Chapel at Wellington Barracks filled with the flower of British society to watch Andrew Parker Bowles marry Camilla Shand.

It was called the society wedding of the season. Some 800 guests crowded into the chapel. The bride wore a diamond tiara that belonged to her family. The groom stood in the dress uniform of the household cavalry.

Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, was there. Princess Margaret was there. And Princess Anne was there, in the congregation, watching Andrew Parker Bowles marry another woman.

Major Bruce Shand gave away his daughter, the soldier who had won two military crosses and survived a German prison camp, handing Camilla into the keeping of a younger officer.

When word reached the Prince of Wales, away at sea, that Camilla was to marry Andrew, he is said to have been heartbroken and to have made some last effort to prevent it. The accounts are second-hand and must be held lightly.

Four months after Andrew married Camilla, on November 14, 1973, Princess Anne married Captain Mark Phillips in Westminster Abbey before a television audience of hundreds of millions.

Within a single year, both of the great romances of Andrew Parker Bowles's youth had resolved themselves in opposite directions and by opposite doors. He had married the girl who wanted him. The princess he had courted had married a soldier of her own.

The marriage that began that morning would last 22 years on paper. Underneath, it would begin to come apart almost at once.

Andrew Parker Bowles did not become an unfaithful husband when his wife took up with a prince. He had been an unfaithful man his whole adult life, and he remained one inside his marriage.

By most accounts, he strayed early, often, and without much attempt at concealment. It was said, and said widely, that his affairs during the marriage included liaisons with several of Camilla's own friends.

He was the first to be unfaithful. And he was unfaithful as a matter of habit rather than heartbreak.

To understand how a marriage could survive on those terms, you have to understand the world it lived inside. Andrew and Camilla belonged to a slice of the English upper class that had, for generations, held a private and unwritten code about marriage.

You married well. You produced children and an heir. You kept up appearances with absolute rigor in public. And behind that public front, discreet infidelity was not so much forgiven as simply expected.

The unforgivable sin in that world was never the affair. It was the scandal. It was letting the thing show.

They set up home at Bolehyde Manor, a rambling Elizabethan house near Allington in Wiltshire. Their son Thomas was born in 1974, the year after the wedding.

The Prince of Wales stood as the boy's godfather, which tells you how tightly this circle was already wound. A daughter, Laura, followed in 1978.

When Tom was born in 1974, the godfather chosen for him was none other than the Prince of Wales, the man who had loved Camilla before the marriage and who would love her through it and long after it.

The affair did not arrive from outside the family like a thief in the night. It grew inside it, among people already bound together by friendship and blood and the small dense world they all shared.

In the summer of 1980, a house changed hands in Gloucestershire and everything about the Parker Bowles marriage changed with it. The house was Highgrove, near Tetbury, bought that August by the Duchy of Cornwall.

Highgrove sat only a short drive from the Parker Bowles home, in the very heart of the same hunting country, the country of the Duke of Beaufort's hunt, where Camilla rode and where the whole of their circle gathered through the long English winters.

The affair between Charles and Camilla had by this point come back to life. It had rekindled around 1979 after years in which they had been friends and neighbors and nothing more.

Highgrove did not begin the affair, but Highgrove gave it a home, a geography, a set of country houses within easy reach of one another. It turned what might have been an occasional weakness into something with the rhythm and permanence of a second marriage conducted in the gaps of the first.

The accounts of biographers suggest that Andrew knew a great deal and that he tolerated it. Some go further and say he effectively approved, that he raised no serious objection to his wife's relationship with the prince.

The precise degree of his knowledge can never be fixed with certainty. But the broad shape is not seriously in doubt. Andrew Parker Bowles was not a husband deceived in the dark. He was a husband who, to a very large extent, knew and looked away.

He was himself unfaithful, freely and repeatedly. And a man conducting his own affairs is in a poor position to forbid his wife hers. The code of his class made a quiet accommodation not only possible, but almost respectable, so long as nobody spoke.

A husband who made no trouble kept everything. He kept his place in the circle. He kept his friendships at the palace. He kept the smooth surface of a life that suited him.

When Charles married Diana in 1981, he did not stop loving the woman who was married to Andrew Parker Bowles. And that single fact would eventually bring the whole hidden structure crashing into the daylight.

The wedding, on July 29, 1981, was the grandest spectacle the modern monarchy had ever staged. A television audience estimated at 750 million people around the world watched.

Camilla was at the wedding. She sat in St. Paul's and watched the man she loved marry a teenage girl.

But the sharper wound of the whole affair belonged to the bride. Shortly before the wedding, Diana discovered a bracelet that Charles had commissioned for Camilla. It was engraved with two little nicknames, the private names the prince and his married friend used for one another: Fred and Gladys.

To Diana, barely 20 and about to give her life to this man, the discovery was a catastrophe. She understood before she had even walked down the aisle that she was marrying into a space that was already occupied.

For a few years, the new arrangement held its shape. The affair between Charles and Camilla is generally said to have cooled for a period around the marriage as the prince tried to make the fairy tale real. But it did not last.

By the middle of the decade, the affair had resumed in earnest. And now there were not three marriages loosely tangled, but a single knot pulled tight.

For Andrew, the years around the royal wedding were outwardly the best of his career. He commanded the Household Cavalry Mounted Regiment in the early 1980s, the very soldiers who escort the sovereign on the great occasions of state.

To the army and the public, he was a model officer at the height of his powers. To the small circle that knew the truth, he was something far more complicated: the husband of the future king's beloved.

On a December night in 1989, a private telephone call was pulled out of the air and recorded. And not one of the people whose lives it would eventually detonate had the faintest idea that it existed.

The date was December 18, 1989. The two voices were the Prince of Wales and Camilla Parker Bowles. And somewhere out in the dark, a stranger with a radio scanner was listening and pressed record.

At a party that year, Diana is said to have confronted Camilla directly and told her that she knew exactly what was going on between her and Charles. It was a moment of raw honesty, entirely alien to the world the older generation had built.

But it was the tape, not the confrontation, that would do the real damage. And the cruelty of it lay in the delay. The call was recorded in December of 1989, and then it simply sat in the hands of whoever held it, a loaded thing waiting in the dark.

For three years, it did not surface in Britain. Three years in which the marriages went on decaying, in which the public still largely believed in the fairy tale, in which Andrew Parker Bowles went on rising through his profession and saying nothing.

Between 1987 and 1990, he held the ceremonial office of Silver Stick in waiting to the Queen, one of the sovereign's personal ceremonial guardians. In 1990, he was promoted brigadier.

By 1992, the royal marriage was no longer a private matter falling quietly apart behind palace walls. It had become a public war, fought through the newspapers. The papers gave it a name that stuck: the War of the Waleses.

The first great blow fell in the summer of 1992, when a book appeared that changed everything. It was written by the journalist Andrew Morton, and it was quickly understood to have been produced with the secret cooperation of the Princess of Wales herself.

The book made public, for the first time and on a national scale, the claim that the fairy tale marriage had been haunted from the start by another woman, and that the other woman was Camilla.

Later that summer came another tape, a recorded telephone conversation between the Princess of Wales and a close male friend, which the press labeled Squidgeygate after a pet name used in it.

And then on December 9, 1992, the thing became official. The Prime Minister, John Major, rose in the House of Commons and announced to Parliament that the Prince and Princess of Wales had agreed to separate.

On January 17, 1993, Britain woke to the most humiliating six minutes ever printed about its future king. The Sunday People and the Sunday Mirror had printed the transcript of the tape recorded on that December night in 1989.

The content was tender and silly, and unmistakably the talk of two people deeply in love. It contained a joke of the prince's about what he might wish to come back as in another life, which traveled around the world within days.

Andrew Parker Bowles woke to find himself overnight, and without having said a single word, the most famous wronged husband in the country.

He had not been on the tape. He had said nothing, done nothing, leaked nothing. He was, in the most literal sense, an innocent party. And yet the publication fell on him with a particular and cruel weight.

For the marriage itself, the tape was the end, whatever the law would take another two years to record. You cannot go on as husband and wife once the whole country has read the transcript of your wife's love affair with the future king.

One old soldier in this story refused to stay silent, and it was not the husband. It was Major Bruce Shand, the bride's father.

According to the accounts of biographers, and it must be held as reported rather than documented, Bruce Shand confronted the Prince of Wales at a private gathering and reproached him directly, face-to-face, for what he had done to his daughter's life. He is said to have told the future king, in so many words, that he had ruined her.

The father spoke. The husband did not. That contrast is the sharpest thing in the whole story, and it cuts both ways.

On June 29, 1994, the television network carried a documentary made with the prince's cooperation, a long and searching film by Jonathan Dimbleby. Some 13 million people were watching when the interviewer asked the prince directly whether he had been faithful to his wife.

The prince, after a lifetime of denial and discretion, admitted that he had not. He had tried to be faithful, he said, until the marriage had irretrievably broken down. The following day, his private secretary confirmed that the woman in question was Camilla Parker Bowles.

In 1994, Andrew retired from the army, closing out a career of 34 years that had carried him from a young officer of the Blues to a brigadier and director of the Royal Army Veterinary Corps.

In January of 1995, the announcement came. The couple issued a jointly agreed statement. Throughout their marriage, they said, they had always tended to follow rather different interests, and in recent years they had led completely separate lives.

They had grown apart, the statement went on, to such an extent that, with the exception of their children and a lasting friendship, there was little of common interest between them.

That was all. No prince, no tape, no blame. A marriage of 22 years dissolved in the language of two civilized people who had simply drifted, with a lasting friendship carefully noted at the close.

The divorce was granted on the ground of that separation, no fault attached to either side, and the decree was made absolute in the early spring of 1995. After 22 years, it was over. And it was over quietly.

One royal courtier, Lord Charteris, caught the mood in a single dry line. The divorce, he observed, would clear the air. And yes, of course, he added, the prince would still be king.

A bitter man would have sold his story, and Andrew Parker Bowles did the opposite. In the year after the divorce, in 1996, he married again, and the marriage was, by every account, a genuinely happy one.

His second wife was Rosemary Pitman, a woman he had known for years, born Rosemary Dickinson in 1940, who had been married before to another army officer and had raised three sons.

Rosemary fell ill with cancer, and on January 10, 2010, she died, aged 69. When she died, Camilla was reported to be deeply saddened and attended a memorial service for her at the Guards Chapel in London that March, the same Guards Chapel where Andrew had married her 37 years before.

At Rosemary's funeral at a Catholic church in Malmesbury, among the mourners was Princess Anne, the woman Andrew had courted 40 years earlier before any of it began.

On April 9, 2005, Charles, Prince of Wales, married Camilla Parker Bowles in a civil ceremony at the Guildhall in Windsor. And there, among the guests, at ease and untroubled, was Andrew, the first husband, with his own second wife, Rosemary, at his side.

The wronged man had come to watch the wedding of the woman he had lost to the man who had taken her. And he had come not as a ghost at the feast, but as a friend.

In a London studio in the early years of the new century, one of the greatest painters of the age spent the better part of a year turning Andrew Parker Bowles into a seven-foot masterpiece. The painter was Lucian Freud, and he called the painting simply The Brigadier.

The Brigadier was finished around 2004. In November of 2015, at Christie's in New York, it was sold at auction for 34.8 million dollars, one of the highest prices ever paid for a Freud.

In late 2023, it emerged that Andrew Parker Bowles, then in his 80s, was in a relationship with the broadcaster Anne Robinson, the famously sharp-tongued television presenter.

On May 6, 2023, in Westminster Abbey, Charles was crowned king and Camilla was crowned queen beside him. And among the congregation, in morning dress, sat Andrew Parker Bowles, 83 years old, with the two children he and Camilla had made together somewhere near him in the great church.

He had married her half a century before in another chapel with the household cavalry lining the aisle. Now he watched her receive a crown from the hands of the man he had lost her to. And he did what he had always done. He watched and he was gracious. And he said nothing at all.

Camilla, the woman being crowned, was the great-granddaughter of Alice Keppel, who had been the mistress of King Edward VII. What the country was witnessing in that Abbey was, in a sense, an old Edwardian arrangement brought at last into the daylight and made lawful.

Was Andrew Parker Bowles a man of honor who bore an unbearable humiliation with a dignity almost no one else could have managed? Or was he a man of convenience who stayed silent because he had too much to lose by speaking?

The evidence, honestly weighed, points both ways at once, and it always will. He was almost certainly both, in proportions that only he could have known, and he took the reckoning with him.

When the couple themselves had described the end of their marriage back in 1995, they had reached in that careful joint statement for one particular phrase to carry the whole of what remained between them: with the exception of their children, and a lasting friendship.

Against every expectation, the words turned out to be true. The friendship did last, through the scandal and the divorce and the second marriage and the widowerhood, all the way to a coronation, where the first husband sat in honored silence and watched his old friend become a queen.

The world had waited 30 years for him to speak. He never did. And in the end, his silence was not the absence of a verdict. It was the verdict.